I 
Anno 2 N. 2
Claudio
Porrini [1], Anna Gloria Sabatini
[2]
Honey bees and pesticides toxicity
[1]
DiSTA - Area Entomolgia, Università di Bologna, Italy
[2] CRA - Istituto
nazionale di apicoltura, Italy
Corresponding author: cporrini@entom.agrsci.unibo.it
For the introduction of plant protection products on the market, ecotoxicological
studies, which are set out by the European Directive 91/414/CEE of July
15, 1991, are required. These regulations consider the effects of pesticides
on the environment and on useful organisms, particularly on honey bees
and other pollinators. Several international institutions, such as the
EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) and the
European Council, collaborated in order to harmonize the evaluation methods.
A common protocol is available for all European Member States, but each
country can choose autonomously which methodologies to adopt.
The European Directive mentioned above is based on the concept of risk
which has replaced that of innocuousness, toxicity being a common property
of all pesticides. Therefore, risk assessment of a pesticide can only
be done after both laboratory and field trials have been conducted, which
lead to classifying a product as of high, medium, low, and negligible
risk to honey bees. The risk assessment procedure takes into account numerous
factors, such as the applied doses, the method of application, the crop
being treated, etc. Each stage of the procedure leads either to an assessment
of the risk or to further tests.
Three parameters are relevant for determining the toxicity (in the laboratory)
and the risk (in the field) of a plant protection product: the characteristics
of the molecule, of the environment in which the product is being used,
and of the test organism. Contrary to what occurs in the field, in the
laboratory the molecule is protected from degradation, but the honey bees
are stressed due to the confinement. Thus, when no toxicity effects are
recorded in laboratory tests, in most cases the product can be considered
harmless to honey bees. However, for reliable risk assessment, test conditions
should resemble usual farming practices, but this would involve expensive
and laborious procedures, difficult to get going, and sometimes the recorded
data are of difficult interpretation. A combination of laboratory and
field tests is a useful alternative. However, when laboratory and field
data do not match, the latter should be considered more reliable than
the former. The recent introduction on the market of new plant protection
products that do not necessarily cause mortality effects in honey bees,
but may affect the behaviour of adult bees and the development of bee
larvae, induced researchers to develop new methods, taking into account
also sublethal effects.
|
|